tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5029766910565939541.post5425544148167858434..comments2023-07-18T07:00:37.471-07:00Comments on .: PELs Kapihan HighlightsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5029766910565939541.post-11431900172871667352009-06-17T01:40:52.848-07:002009-06-17T01:40:52.848-07:00Thanks Sir Berne for the corrections...Thanks Sir Berne for the corrections...Chris Watchonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18189674648510715816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5029766910565939541.post-56314838947229255982008-02-20T23:07:00.000-08:002008-02-20T23:07:00.000-08:00I just found this post, through google, months aft...I just found this post, through google, months after the "Kapihan sa PeLS", but I wish to clarify what I said as abbreviatedly reported, in the post, may be inaccurate:<BR/><BR/>1. Copyright may be assigned in whole or in part. (Section 180, RA 8293). I think what I was pointing about Creative Commons licensing then was that licensing a work is not the operative act to protect one's works but that a work is protected from the fact of its creation. (Section 172.2, RA 8293), and that licensing is different from assignment of copyright.<BR/>...<BR/>...<BR/>4. I think what I relayed was the distinction between "Original Works" and "Derivative Works"; and the reiteration that copyright laws protect the expression and not ideas (See Section 175, RA 8293 in part provides: "...no protection shall extend, under this law, to any idea, procedure, system, method or operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data as such, even if they are expressed, explained, illustrated or embodied in a work...")<BR/>5. "the importance of using the CC license in creative works...." should be qualified with "if one intends to share his/her works to the public."<BR/>6. It should be "You can license your works with CC licenses if you OWN the works"; and that "Commercial exploitation of one's OWN work may be had as an NC license does not preclude the author from doing so (only the licensee is the one prevented from pursuing commercial exploitation)" instead of "you can change CC licence from NC to Commercial just make sure that it is your OWN work..."<BR/>7. "WEST" is in the context of "Licensors in western countries..."<BR/>...<BR/>9. "Inventions are under patents," illustrations and documents pertaining to patentable items may be copyright-able under Section 172, RA 8293 and under prevailing jurisprudence/case law.<BR/><BR/>Hope this helps.Bernehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400436079339043073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5029766910565939541.post-16095046722402321672008-02-20T22:22:00.000-08:002008-02-20T22:22:00.000-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Bernehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400436079339043073noreply@blogger.com